Date: 2011-04-20 12:38 am (UTC)
well, we have to be fair, this crap costs major jack and there needs to be a return on that investment. I mean, there's horrid, horrid movies being cranked out for the SciFi... sorry, SyFy channel that cost like a buck fiddynine and yeah, Sharktopus did have some humor value but man, can't anyone come up with a modern exploitation film that actually has some fun and snap and smarts to it?

(Riverworld. OM f'ing God Riverworld. I enjoy Farmer and the books were interesting but holy cats did this 'film' stink up the place. WHY? I guess they feared that opening shot of billions of bald, totally hairless and utterly naked people...)

No. They can't.

I mean, Speed Racer cost a lot of money. It *shouldn't* have. Thing should have been like 2 Mil, tops, to make. But Hollywood won't take you seriously if your movie doesn't budget out at $100 Mil or better. Yikes.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 04:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios